Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind vs Vivo T4R

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind (2026) runs on the HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, while the Vivo T4R (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400; launch prices were $1165 and $230. By overall MobileRank rating, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind leads — 74/100 vs 55/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5700); the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind is faster in AnTuTu (2,116,240 vs 953,150); the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T4R doesn't; the Vivo T4R is noticeably lighter (183g vs 239g).

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind is noticeably better than the Vivo T4R — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

Performance 77
Display 84
Camera 68
Battery 83
Portability 32
Value for money 58

Vivo T4R

Performance 57
Display 79
Camera 37
Battery 54
Portability 76
Value for money 64

What makes Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2116240 vs 953150
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1680 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6200 vs 3185
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 44W

  • Higher performance (77/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (68/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)

What makes Vivo T4R better?

  • Lighter: 183g vs 239g
  • Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $1165

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 32/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind vs the Vivo T4R, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind scores 19 points higher (74/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind leads (77/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind leads (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind leads (83/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind — 58/100, Vivo T4R — 64/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind notably outperforms the Vivo T4R (77/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind significantly outperforms the Vivo T4R (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind notably outperforms the Vivo T4R (83/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo T4R significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind (76/100 vs 32/100).

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind: The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.

Specs comparison

Specification Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind Vivo T4R
Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7400
AnTuTu 2116240 953150
Geekbench Single 1680 1061
Geekbench Multi 6200 3185
Display 6.9" LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1320x2848 1080x2392
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5700 mAh
Charging 100W 44W
Wireless charging 80W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 40 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS HarmonyOS 6.0 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 8000 nits 1800 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 164.4×79.0×8.3 mm 163.3×76.7×7.4 mm
Weight 239 g 183 g
Launch price $1165 $230

Camera comparison

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 40MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
68
camera

Vivo T4R

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 32MP
37
camera

Display comparison

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

  • 6.9" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1320x2848
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Vivo T4R

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2392
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
83
battery

Vivo T4R

  • 5700 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
54
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind and Vivo T4R, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
74/100
2116240 AnTuTu
Vivo T4R MediaTek Dimensity 7400
55/100 -122.0%
953150 AnTuTu

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind leads Vivo T4R by 122.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

$1165

Vivo T4R

$230

Launch price difference: $935. Vivo T4R was $935 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind notably outperforms the Vivo T4R (77/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind significantly outperforms the Vivo T4R (68/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind notably outperforms the Vivo T4R (83/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo T4R significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind (76/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind or the Vivo T4R?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind is noticeably better than the Vivo T4R — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind and the Vivo T4R?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo T4R — 55/100.

Which has the better camera: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind or the Vivo T4R?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind leads on camera score (68/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind or the Vivo T4R?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind leads on performance (77/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind over the Vivo T4R?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.