Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind vs Poco F9 Pro

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind (2026) runs on the HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, while the Poco F9 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1165 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 74/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F9 Pro has the bigger battery (6330 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,228,426 vs 2,116,240); the Poco F9 Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 239g).

The Poco F9 Pro is noticeably better than the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

Performance 77
Display 84
Camera 68
Battery 83
Portability 32
Value for money 58

Poco F9 Pro

Performance 95
Display 91
Camera 74
Battery 84
Portability 47
Value for money 82

What makes Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind better?

  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 50W

  • Overall rating 74/100

What makes Poco F9 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3228426 vs 2116240
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1680
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6200
  • Bigger battery: 6330 vs 6000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 206g vs 239g
  • Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $1165

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better camera (74/100 vs 68/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better display (91/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (47/100 vs 32/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind vs the Poco F9 Pro, the Poco F9 Pro scores 10 points higher (84/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (95/100 vs 77/100). Value score: Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind — 58/100, Poco F9 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind (95/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind (47/100 vs 32/100).

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind: The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.
Poco F9 Pro: The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind Poco F9 Pro
Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2116240 3228426
Geekbench Single 1680 3639
Geekbench Multi 6200 11047
Display 6.9" LTPO OLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 1320x2848 1156x2510
Refresh rate 120 Hz 185 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6330 mAh
Charging 100W 100W
Wireless charging 80W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 40 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS HarmonyOS 6.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 8000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 164.4×79.0×8.3 mm 157.5×75.3×8.8 mm
Weight 239 g 206 g
Launch price $1165 $699

Camera comparison

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 40MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
68
camera

Poco F9 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera

Display comparison

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

  • 6.9" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1320x2848
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1156x2510
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
91
display

Battery and charging

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
83
battery

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6330 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind and Poco F9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
74/100
2116240 AnTuTu
Poco F9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +34.4%
3228426 AnTuTu

Poco F9 Pro leads Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind by 34.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind

$1165

Poco F9 Pro

$699

Launch price difference: $466. Poco F9 Pro was $466 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind (95/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind (47/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro is noticeably better than the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind and the Poco F9 Pro?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Poco F9 Pro — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro leads on camera score (74/100 vs 68/100).

Which is more powerful: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro leads on performance (95/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind over the Poco F9 Pro?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Wind is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.