Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (2025) runs on the HiSilicon Kirin 9030, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; estimated prices are $1050 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max leads — 74/100 vs 71/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 6000); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,728,128 vs 2,101,808).

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 Max by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
Performance 77
Display 84
Camera 68
Battery 83
Portability 32
Value for money 60
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Performance 88
Display 84
Camera 37
Battery 80
Portability 54
Value for money 84
What makes Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max better?

  • Better camera (68/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2728128 vs 2101808
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1680
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 6200
  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Cheaper: $300 vs $1050

  • Higher performance (88/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max scores 3 points higher (74/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (88/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max leads (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (84/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (88/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (54/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (84/100 vs 60/100).

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max: The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max: The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9030 MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 2101808 2728128
Geekbench Single 1680 2680
Geekbench Multi 6200 8358
Display 6.9" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1320x2848 2772x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 9000 mAh
Charging 100W 100W
Wireless charging 80W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 40 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 13 MP 20 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS HarmonyOS 6.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 8000 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 164.4×79.0×8.3 mm 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm
Weight 239 g
Price $1050 $300
Camera comparison
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 40MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
68
camera
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera
Display comparison
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
  • 6.9" OLED
  • Resolution: 1320x2848
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
83
battery
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030
74/100
2101808 AnTuTu
Redmi Turbo 5 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
71/100 +23.0%
2728128 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max by 23.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
$1050
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
$300

Price difference: $750. Redmi Turbo 5 Max is cheaper by $750.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (88/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (68/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (54/100 vs 32/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (84/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 Max by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max leads on camera score (68/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (88/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.