Huawei Mate 50 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Huawei Mate 50 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1299 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 71/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,324,913); the Huawei Mate 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the Huawei Mate 50 Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

Performance 70
Display 82
Camera 80
Battery 62
Portability 50
Value for money 52

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Huawei Mate 50 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 205g vs 227g

  • Better camera (80/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1324913
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 66W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1299

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 82/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Mate 50 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 18 points higher (89/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 62/100). Value score: Huawei Mate 50 Pro — 52/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 50 Pro (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 50 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 50 Pro (92/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (50/100 vs 35/100).

Huawei Mate 50 Pro: The Huawei Mate 50 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Huawei Mate 50 Pro Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1324913 4602290
Geekbench Single 1761 3639
Geekbench Multi 4688 11047
Display 6.7" OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2616x1212 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 66W 120W
Wireless charging 50W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 149 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS HarmonyOS 3.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.1×75.5×8.5 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 205 g 227 g
Launch price $1299 $799

Camera comparison

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 13MP
80
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

  • 6.7" OLED
  • Resolution: 2616x1212
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • Wireless: 50W
62
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Mate 50 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Mate 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
71/100
1324913 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +71.2%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Huawei Mate 50 Pro by 71.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

$1299

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $500. Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra was $500 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 50 Pro (99/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 50 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 50 Pro (92/100 vs 62/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (50/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Huawei Mate 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the Huawei Mate 50 Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Huawei Mate 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Huawei Mate 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which is more powerful: the Huawei Mate 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Mate 50 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Huawei Mate 50 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.