Honor X9c vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Honor X9c (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 56/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X9c has the bigger battery (6600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 737,054).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X9c
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Honor X9c better?
- Bigger battery: 6600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Lighter: 195g vs 204g
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (62/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 737054
- Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 2700
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X9c vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 15 points higher (71/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor X9c (68/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Honor X9c and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Honor X9c (86/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X9c is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor X9c is a bit better (62/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X9c | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 737054 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 930 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2700 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.5×8.0 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $280 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor X9c
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor X9c
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor X9c
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X9c and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Honor X9c by 43.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor X9c (68/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X9c and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Honor X9c (86/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X9c is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X9c is a bit better (62/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X9c or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably better than the Honor X9c — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X9c and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor X9c has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X9c or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X9c or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Honor X9c over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.