Honor X8 vs Vivo Y35 4G
The Honor X8 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, while the Vivo Y35 4G (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y35 4G leads — 39/100 vs 38/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y35 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor X8 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y35 4G doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X8
Vivo Y35 4G
What makes Honor X8 better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 177g vs 188g
- Better camera (42/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Vivo Y35 4G better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 5W
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 22/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X8 vs the Vivo Y35 4G, the Vivo Y35 4G scores 1 points higher (39/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X8 leads (42/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y35 4G leads (48/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 31/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X8 is a bit better (42/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y35 4G notably outperforms the Honor X8 (48/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor X8 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X8 | Vivo Y35 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | |
| AnTuTu | 424216 | 424216 | |
| Geekbench Single | 412 | 412 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1423 | 1423 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 5W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2, Google Play Services | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 550 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP5X | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×74.7×7.5 mm | 164.3×76.1×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 177 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $260 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor X8
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y35 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor X8
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y35 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor X8
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y35 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X8 and Vivo Y35 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y35 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 31/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X8 is a bit better (42/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y35 4G notably outperforms the Honor X8 (48/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X8 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X8 or the Vivo Y35 4G?
The Vivo Y35 4G edges out the Honor X8 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X8 and the Vivo Y35 4G?
The Honor X8 has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo Y35 4G — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X8 or the Vivo Y35 4G?
The Honor X8 leads on camera score (42/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Honor X8 over the Vivo Y35 4G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y35 4G (48/100 vs 22/100).