Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) vs Vivo T2x (India)
The Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6020, while the Vivo T2x (India) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6020. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) leads — 43/100 vs 42/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T2x (India) doesn't; the Vivo T2x (India) is noticeably lighter (184g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X7b 5G (50 MP)
Vivo T2x (India)
What makes Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 35W vs 18W
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo T2x (India) better?
- Lighter: 184g vs 199g
- Better display (57/100 vs 53/100)
- Better portability (67/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) vs the Vivo T2x (India), the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) scores 1 points higher (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) leads (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo T2x (India) and the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) are nearly equal (57/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo T2x (India) is a bit better (67/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) | Vivo T2x (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6020 | MediaTek Dimensity 6020 | |
| AnTuTu | 530583 | 530583 | |
| Geekbench Single | 724 | 724 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2032 | 2032 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.2 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.7×76.5×8.2 mm | 164.1×75.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor X7b 5G (50 MP)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo T2x (India)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor X7b 5G (50 MP)
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo T2x (India)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Honor X7b 5G (50 MP)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo T2x (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) and Vivo T2x (India), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo T2x (India) and the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) are nearly equal (57/100 vs 53/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo T2x (India) is a bit better (67/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) or the Vivo T2x (India)?
The Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) edges out the Vivo T2x (India) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) and the Vivo T2x (India)?
The Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo T2x (India) — 42/100.
Should you choose the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) over the Vivo T2x (India)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Honor X7b 5G (50 MP) (54/100 vs 43/100).