Honor X6s vs Samsung Galaxy M04
The Honor X6s (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G25 (), while the Samsung Galaxy M04 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X6s leads — 28/100 vs 25/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M04 is faster in AnTuTu (199,111 vs 163,723).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X6s
Samsung Galaxy M04
What makes Honor X6s better?
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy M04 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 199111 vs 163723
- Better Geekbench Single: 476 vs 185
- Better Geekbench Multi: 828 vs 521
- Lighter: 188g vs 194g
- Higher performance (19/100 vs 9/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X6s vs the Samsung Galaxy M04, the Honor X6s scores 3 points higher (28/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M04 leads (19/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X6s leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M04 is a bit better (19/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X6s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M04 (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X6s is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X6s | Samsung Galaxy M04 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G25 () | MediaTek Helio P35 | |
| AnTuTu | 163723 | 199111 | |
| Geekbench Single | 185 | 476 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 521 | 828 | |
| Display | 6.5" TFT LCD (IPS) | 6.5" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | — | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 12 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.1×8.7 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor X6s
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy M04
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Honor X6s
- 6.5" TFT LCD (IPS)
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy M04
- 6.5" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Honor X6s
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M04
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X6s and Samsung Galaxy M04, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M04 leads Honor X6s by 17.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M04 is a bit better (19/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X6s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M04 (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X6s is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X6s or the Samsung Galaxy M04?
The Honor X6s edges out the Samsung Galaxy M04 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X6s and the Samsung Galaxy M04?
The Honor X6s has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Samsung Galaxy M04 — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X6s or the Samsung Galaxy M04?
The Honor X6s leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X6s or the Samsung Galaxy M04?
The Samsung Galaxy M04 leads on performance (19/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Honor X6s over the Samsung Galaxy M04?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Honor X6s (30/100 vs 10/100).