Honor X6s vs Nokia G310

The Honor X6s (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G25 (), while the Nokia G310 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G310 leads — 39/100 vs 28/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G310 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 163,723).

The Nokia G310 is noticeably better than the Honor X6s — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor X6s

Performance 9
Display 39
Camera 30
Battery 52
Portability 55
Value for money —

Nokia G310

Performance 41
Display 44
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 56
Value for money —

What makes Honor X6s better?

  • Lighter: 194g vs 195g

  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Nokia G310 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 163723
  • Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 185
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 521

  • Higher performance (41/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better display (44/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better portability (56/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor X6s vs the Nokia G310, the Nokia G310 scores 11 points higher (39/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 leads (41/100 vs 9/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 significantly outperforms the Honor X6s (41/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor X6s is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia G310 and the Honor X6s are nearly equal (56/100 vs 55/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Honor X6s Nokia G310
Processor MediaTek Helio G25 () Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
AnTuTu 163723 477542
Geekbench Single 185 746
Geekbench Multi 521 1816
Display 6.5" TFT LCD (IPS) 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1600 720x1612
Refresh rate — 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging — 20W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 8 MP
RAM — 4GB
Storage 128GB 128GB
OS Android 12 Snow Cone Android 13
NFC no no
Dimensions 163.7×75.1×8.7 mm 165.1×75.7×8.6 mm
Weight 194 g 195 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Honor X6s

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 5MP
30
camera

Nokia G310

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Honor X6s

  • 6.5" TFT LCD (IPS)
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

Nokia G310

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display

Battery and charging

Honor X6s

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Nokia G310

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor X6s and Nokia G310, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor X6s MediaTek Helio G25 ()
28/100
163723 AnTuTu
Nokia G310 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
39/100 +65.7%
477542 AnTuTu

Nokia G310 leads Honor X6s by 65.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 significantly outperforms the Honor X6s (41/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor X6s is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia G310 and the Honor X6s are nearly equal (56/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor X6s or the Nokia G310?

The Nokia G310 is noticeably better than the Honor X6s — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Honor X6s and the Nokia G310?

The Honor X6s has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Nokia G310 — 39/100.

Which is more powerful: the Honor X6s or the Nokia G310?

The Nokia G310 leads on performance (41/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Honor X6s over the Nokia G310?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Nokia G310 (41/100 vs 9/100).