Honor X6e vs Poco X7 Pro
The Honor X6e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Poco X7 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco X7 Pro leads — 64/100 vs 40/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X6e has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6000); the Poco X7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,884,839 vs 358,383); the Poco X7 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor X6e doesn't.
Honor X6e
Poco X7 Pro
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6000 mAh
- Overall rating 40/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1884839 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Lighter: 195g vs 207g
- Higher performance (75/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (65/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Honor X6e vs the Poco X7 Pro, the Poco X7 Pro scores 24 points higher (64/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco X7 Pro leads (75/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X6e (75/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X6e (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro and the Honor X6e are nearly equal (65/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Honor X6e | Poco X7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | 1884839 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 1579 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 6100 | |
| Display | 6.6" TFT LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1604 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 15 / HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1010 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×75.9×8.3 mm | 160.8×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | — | $369 |
Honor X6e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Poco X7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor X6e
- 6.6" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco X7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X6e
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Poco X7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor X6e and Poco X7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco X7 Pro leads Honor X6e by 81.0% in our overall performance rating.
Honor X6e
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X6e (75/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X6e (83/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro and the Honor X6e are nearly equal (65/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Honor X6e or the Poco X7 Pro?
The Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X6e by 24 points (64/100 vs 40/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X6e and the Poco X7 Pro?
The Honor X6e has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Poco X7 Pro — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X6e or the Poco X7 Pro?
The Poco X7 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X6e or the Poco X7 Pro?
The Poco X7 Pro leads on performance (75/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Honor X6e over the Poco X7 Pro?
The Honor X6e is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco X7 Pro is a better fit for active users.