Honor X6c vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
The Honor X6c (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 38/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X6c has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 358,608); the Honor X6c is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X6c
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What makes Honor X6c better?
- Bigger battery: 5300 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 35W vs 25W
- Lighter: 199g vs 215g
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 1416
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (76/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (78/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X6c vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 37 points higher (75/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X6c leads (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Honor X6c (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Honor X6c (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Honor X6c (76/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X6c is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X6c | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 358608 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 9174 | |
| Display | 6.6" TFT LCD | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1604 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 145 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1010 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.6×8.4 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1999 |
Camera comparison
Honor X6c
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor X6c
- 6.6" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor X6c
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X6c and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Honor X6c by 88.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor X6c
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Honor X6c (91/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Honor X6c (78/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Honor X6c (76/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X6c is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X6c or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Honor X6c by 37 points (75/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X6c and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Honor X6c has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X6c or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X6c or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Honor X6c over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.