Honor X50 Pro vs Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
The Honor X50 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X50 Pro leads — 61/100 vs 59/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X50 Pro has the bigger battery (5800 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,601,869 vs 1,425,446); the Honor X50 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 235g).
Honor X50 Pro
Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
- Bigger battery: 5800 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 235g
- Better display (82/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 22/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1601869 vs 1425446
- Faster charging: 65W vs 35W
- Higher performance (72/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Honor X50 Pro vs the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro, the Honor X50 Pro scores 2 points higher (61/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro and the Honor X50 Pro are nearly equal (72/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Honor X50 Pro and the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro and the Honor X50 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100. In the "portability" category, the Honor X50 Pro significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro (64/100 vs 22/100).
| Specification | Honor X50 Pro | Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | 1601869 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 4688 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1220x2652 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, Redmagic 5.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×75.5×8.0 mm | 166.3×77.1×10.0 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 235 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Honor X50 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1220x2652
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X50 Pro
- 5800 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor X50 Pro and Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro leads Honor X50 Pro by 11.0% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro and the Honor X50 Pro are nearly equal (72/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X50 Pro and the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro and the Honor X50 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X50 Pro significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro (64/100 vs 22/100).
Which is better: the Honor X50 Pro or the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro?
The Honor X50 Pro edges out the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X50 Pro and the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro?
The Honor X50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro — 59/100.
Should you choose the Honor X50 Pro over the Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro?
The Honor X50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Nubia Red Magic 7S Pro is a better fit for active users.