Honor X40 GT Racing vs Xiaomi Mi CC9e
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (2019) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 17/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4030); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e doesn't; the Xiaomi Mi CC9e is noticeably lighter (173g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4030 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 173g vs 199g
- Better camera (35/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (83/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Xiaomi Mi CC9e, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 13 points higher (30/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e is a bit better (35/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (83/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Xiaomi Mi CC9e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.0" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1560 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4030 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie); MIUI 10 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 153.5×71.9×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 173 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
- 6.0" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
- 4030 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e is a bit better (35/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi CC9e (43/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (83/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Xiaomi Mi CC9e?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Mi CC9e — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Xiaomi Mi CC9e?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Xiaomi Mi CC9e — 17/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Xiaomi Mi CC9e?
The Xiaomi Mi CC9e leads on camera score (35/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Xiaomi Mi CC9e?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi Mi CC9e is a better fit for everyday use.