Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Spark 50 4G
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Spark 50 4G (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Spark 50 4G leads — 32/100 vs 30/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 50 4G has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 210g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 37/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Spark 50 4G, the Tecno Spark 50 4G scores 2 points higher (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Spark 50 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 50 4G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 4G is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Spark 50 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Spark 50 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Helio G81 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 358383 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 167.8×79.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 210 g | |
| Price | — | $139 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 50 4G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 4G is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Spark 50 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Spark 50 4G?
The Tecno Spark 50 4G edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 50 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Spark 50 4G — 32/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Spark 50 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Spark 50 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.