Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Pova Curve
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova Curve leads — 37/100 vs 30/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Tecno Pova Curve is thinner (7.5mm vs 8.5mm).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Pova Curve
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 199g
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (49/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (95/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the Tecno Pova Curve scores 7 points higher (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Curve leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (35/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (95/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | — | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g | |
| Price | — | $219 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova Curve
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova Curve
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova Curve and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (35/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (95/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Tecno Pova Curve edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Tecno Pova Curve leads on camera score (35/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.