Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Pova 6 Neo
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Pova 6 Neo (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 6 Neo leads — 31/100 vs 30/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 6 Neo has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Pova 6 Neo
- Faster charging: 66W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Pova 6 Neo, the Tecno Pova 6 Neo scores 1 points higher (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Neo leads (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova 6 Neo are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Neo is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova 6 Neo are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Pova 6 Neo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | — | 408000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, HIOS 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 580 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP53 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 168.6×76.6×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova 6 Neo
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Pova 6 Neo
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova 6 Neo
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova 6 Neo are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Neo is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova 6 Neo are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova 6 Neo?
The Tecno Pova 6 Neo edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova 6 Neo?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Pova 6 Neo — 31/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Pova 6 Neo?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova 6 Neo is a better fit for everyday use.