Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Pova 3
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Pova 3 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 24/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 3 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Pova 3
- Faster charging: 66W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 230g
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 12/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better camera (28/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Pova 3, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 6 points higher (30/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 3 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 3 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (28/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 3 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 3 (51/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Pova 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G88 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 362744 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 430 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1375 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11, HIOS | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 173.1×78.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 230 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova 3
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Pova 3
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova 3
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 3 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 3 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (28/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 3 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 3 (51/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova 3?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Tecno Pova 3 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova 3?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Pova 3 — 24/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Pova 3?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova 3 is a better fit for everyday use.