Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Camon 20
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Camon 20 (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 21/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 20 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 20 doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Camon 20
- Faster charging: 66W vs 33W
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (43/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Camon 20, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 9 points higher (30/100 vs 21/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 20 leads (43/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 20 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 20 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (43/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Camon 20 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 420 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1364 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, HIOS 13 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP53 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.4×76.7×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon 20
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon 20
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 20
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 20 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 20 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (43/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 20?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Tecno Camon 20 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Camon 20 — 21/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 20?
The Tecno Camon 20 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Camon 20?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Camon 20 is a better fit for everyday use.