Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro leads — 35/100 vs 30/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 20 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Camon 20 Pro
- Faster charging: 66W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 39/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (4/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Camon 20 Pro, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro scores 5 points higher (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro leads (43/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (43/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Camon 20 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1031881 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, HIOS 13 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.4×76.7×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon 20 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon 20 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 20 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (43/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 20 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 20 Pro edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro — 35/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 20 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 20 Pro leads on camera score (43/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Camon 20 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Camon 20 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.