Honor X40 GT Racing vs Samsung Galaxy M53
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy M53 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M53 leads — 36/100 vs 30/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M53 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M53 is noticeably lighter (176g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Faster charging: 66W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 176g vs 199g
- Better camera (48/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (80/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Samsung Galaxy M53, the Samsung Galaxy M53 scores 6 points higher (36/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M53 leads (48/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M53 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (48/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M53 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (80/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Samsung Galaxy M53 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 671241 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1003 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2423 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED Plus | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.7×77.0×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 176 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M53
- 6.7" Super AMOLED Plus
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M53
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M53 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (48/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M53 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (80/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy M53?
The Samsung Galaxy M53 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy M53?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Samsung Galaxy M53 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy M53?
The Samsung Galaxy M53 leads on camera score (48/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Samsung Galaxy M53?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M53 is a better fit for everyday use.