Honor X40 GT Racing vs Nokia X30
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Nokia X30 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 23/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4200).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Nokia X30
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 20/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Lighter: 185g vs 199g
- Better camera (33/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Nokia X30, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 7 points higher (30/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (33/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (43/100 vs 20/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Nokia X30 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 592015 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 905 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2003 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 700 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP67 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 158.9×73.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 185 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia X30
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia X30
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Nokia X30
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (33/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (43/100 vs 20/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (68/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Nokia X30?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Nokia X30 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Nokia X30?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Nokia X30 — 23/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Nokia X30?
The Nokia X30 leads on camera score (33/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Nokia X30?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Nokia X30 is a better fit for everyday use.