Honor X40 GT Racing vs Motorola S50 Neo
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Motorola S50 Neo (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola S50 Neo leads — 33/100 vs 30/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola S50 Neo has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Motorola S50 Neo is noticeably lighter (171g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Motorola S50 Neo
- Faster charging: 66W vs 30W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 39/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 171g vs 199g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (86/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Motorola S50 Neo, the Motorola S50 Neo scores 3 points higher (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola S50 Neo leads (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola S50 Neo is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Motorola S50 Neo are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola S50 Neo significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (86/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Motorola S50 Neo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 622608 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 938 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2183 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" P-OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 161.9×73.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 171 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola S50 Neo
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola S50 Neo
- 6.7" P-OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Motorola S50 Neo
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola S50 Neo is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Motorola S50 Neo are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola S50 Neo significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (86/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola S50 Neo?
The Motorola S50 Neo edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Motorola S50 Neo?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Motorola S50 Neo — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola S50 Neo?
The Motorola S50 Neo leads on camera score (37/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Motorola S50 Neo?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola S50 Neo is a better fit for everyday use.