Honor X40 GT Racing vs Motorola Razr 60
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Motorola Razr 60 (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 leads — 33/100 vs 30/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4500).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Motorola Razr 60
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 30W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 27/100)
- Lighter: 188g vs 199g
- Higher performance (3/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (39/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (62/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Motorola Razr 60, the Motorola Razr 60 scores 3 points higher (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 leads (39/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (3/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (39/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (43/100 vs 27/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (62/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Motorola Razr 60 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X | |
| AnTuTu | — | 886677 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.9" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 2640x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 30W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1700 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 188 g | |
| Price | — | $700 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 60
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr 60
- 6.9" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr 60
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (3/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (39/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 (43/100 vs 27/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 is a bit better (62/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Razr 60?
The Motorola Razr 60 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Motorola Razr 60?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Motorola Razr 60 — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Razr 60?
The Motorola Razr 60 leads on camera score (39/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Motorola Razr 60?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola Razr 60 is a better fit for everyday use.