Honor X40 GT Racing vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 48/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.5mm).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4700 mAh
- Overall rating 48/100
- Faster charging: 68W vs 66W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Better camera (57/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 75/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 28 points higher (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (94/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3113462 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 7.0" pOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1224x2912 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Price | — | $1236 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (94/100 vs 75/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (57/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing by 28 points (76/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.