Honor X40 GT Racing vs Motorola Razr 50
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Motorola Razr 50 (2024) on specs and benchmarks. Both devices score the same overall rating of 30/100. Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4200); the Motorola Razr 50 is thinner (7.3mm vs 8.5mm).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Motorola Razr 50
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 30W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 22/100)
- Lighter: 188g vs 199g
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (36/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 51/100)
The Honor X40 GT Racing and the Motorola Razr 50 received the same MobileRank rating — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 is a bit better (36/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 50 is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Motorola Razr 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | |
| AnTuTu | — | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 30W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 92 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 188 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr 50
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr 50
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 is a bit better (36/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (43/100 vs 22/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 50 is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Razr 50?
Both devices scored 30/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Motorola Razr 50.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Motorola Razr 50?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Motorola Razr 50 — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Razr 50?
The Motorola Razr 50 leads on camera score (36/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Motorola Razr 50?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola Razr 50 is a better fit for everyday use.