Honor Win vs Tecno Camon 40
The Honor Win (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 40 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win leads — 78/100 vs 51/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 5200); the Honor Win is faster in AnTuTu (3,873,442 vs 576,015).
Honor Win
Tecno Camon 40
- Higher AnTuTu: 3873442 vs 576015
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2014
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (95/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 30/100)
Comparing the Honor Win vs the Tecno Camon 40, the Honor Win scores 27 points higher (78/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Win leads (97/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win leads (95/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (97/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Win and the Tecno Camon 40 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (95/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 significantly outperforms the Honor Win (78/100 vs 30/100).
| Specification | Honor Win | Tecno Camon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3873442 | 576015 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 2014 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1272x2800 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, HIOS 15 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.1×74.6×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | — | |
| Launch price | $599 | — |
Honor Win
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 40
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Win
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Win
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Tecno Camon 40
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Win and Tecno Camon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Win leads Tecno Camon 40 by 572.5% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Camon 40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (97/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Win and the Tecno Camon 40 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (95/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 significantly outperforms the Honor Win (78/100 vs 30/100).
Which is better: the Honor Win or the Tecno Camon 40?
The Honor Win significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 by 27 points (78/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Win and the Tecno Camon 40?
The Honor Win has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Tecno Camon 40 — 51/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win or the Tecno Camon 40?
The Honor Win leads on performance (97/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win over the Tecno Camon 40?
The Honor Win is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Tecno Camon 40 is a better fit for everyday use.