Honor Win Turbo vs Redmi K80
The Honor Win Turbo (2026) runs on the Dimensity 8500 Elite, while the Redmi K80 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $359 and $345. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 leads — 67/100 vs 65/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win Turbo has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 6550); the Redmi K80 is faster in AnTuTu (2,288,566 vs 2,268,740).
Honor Win Turbo
Redmi K80
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 6550 mAh
- Longer battery life (76/100 vs 68/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2288566 vs 2268740
- Better Geekbench Single: 2205 vs 1553
- Better Geekbench Multi: 7192 vs 6403
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Lighter: 213g vs 216g
- Cheaper at launch: $345 vs $359
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 34/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Better portability (50/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Honor Win Turbo vs the Redmi K80, the Redmi K80 scores 2 points higher (67/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Honor Win Turbo — 70/100, Redmi K80 — 74/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 and the Honor Win Turbo are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 and the Honor Win Turbo are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win Turbo is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi K80 is a bit better (50/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Honor Win Turbo | Redmi K80 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8500 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2268740 | 2288566 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | 2205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | 7192 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 6550 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 8000 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 216 g | 213 g | |
| Launch price | $359 | $345 |
Honor Win Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi K80
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor Win Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K80
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Win Turbo
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K80
- 6550 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Win Turbo and Redmi K80, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K80 leads Honor Win Turbo by 0.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $14. Redmi K80 was $14 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 and the Honor Win Turbo are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 and the Honor Win Turbo are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win Turbo is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi K80 is a bit better (50/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Honor Win Turbo or the Redmi K80?
The Redmi K80 edges out the Honor Win Turbo by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Win Turbo and the Redmi K80?
The Honor Win Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Redmi K80 — 67/100.
Should you choose the Honor Win Turbo over the Redmi K80?
The Honor Win Turbo is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Redmi K80 is a better fit for gamers and power users.