Honor WIN RT2 vs Oscal Flat 3C
The Honor WIN RT2 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Oscal Flat 3C (2026) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T310. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor WIN RT2 leads — 81/100 vs 34/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Honor WIN RT2 has the bigger battery (12070 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 32 MP; the Honor WIN RT2 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oscal Flat 3C doesn't; the Oscal Flat 3C is noticeably lighter (199g vs 238g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor WIN RT2
Oscal Flat 3C
What makes Honor WIN RT2 better?
- Bigger battery: 12070 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 32MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (58/100 vs 22/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (97/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Oscal Flat 3C better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 238g
- Better portability (50/100 vs 31/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor WIN RT2 vs the Oscal Flat 3C, the Honor WIN RT2 scores 47 points higher (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor WIN RT2 leads (58/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor WIN RT2 leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Honor WIN RT2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (97/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor WIN RT2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (58/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor WIN RT2 notably outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C notably outperforms the Honor WIN RT2 (50/100 vs 31/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor WIN RT2 | Oscal Flat 3C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc Tiger T310 | |
| AnTuTu | 4040013 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | — | |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1440x3104 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 12070 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 32 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×78.0×8.5 mm | 165.3×76.7×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 238 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | $130 |
Camera comparison
Honor WIN RT2
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Oscal Flat 3C
- Main: 32MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Honor WIN RT2
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3104
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Oscal Flat 3C
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor WIN RT2
- 12070 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Oscal Flat 3C
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor WIN RT2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Honor WIN RT2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (97/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor WIN RT2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (58/100 vs 22/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor WIN RT2 notably outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (78/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C notably outperforms the Honor WIN RT2 (50/100 vs 31/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor WIN RT2 or the Oscal Flat 3C?
The Honor WIN RT2 significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C by 47 points (81/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Honor WIN RT2 and the Oscal Flat 3C?
The Honor WIN RT2 has a MobileRank rating of 81/100, the Oscal Flat 3C — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor WIN RT2 or the Oscal Flat 3C?
The Honor WIN RT2 leads on camera score (58/100 vs 22/100).
Should you choose the Honor WIN RT2 over the Oscal Flat 3C?
The Honor WIN RT2 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.