Honor Win RT vs Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
The Honor Win RT (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870; estimated prices are $384 and $349. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win RT leads — 66/100 vs 9/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win RT has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 2350); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor Win RT is faster in AnTuTu (3,095,021 vs 192,269); the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 is noticeably lighter (138g vs 229g).
Honor Win RT
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
- Higher AnTuTu: 3095021 vs 192269
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 172
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 492
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 2350 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (42/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 138g vs 229g
- Cheaper: $349 vs $384
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 13/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Honor Win RT vs the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017, the Honor Win RT scores 57 points higher (66/100 vs 9/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT leads (69/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Win RT leads (42/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT leads (80/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (69/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (42/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (80/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 significantly outperforms the Honor Win RT (100/100 vs 13/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 and the Honor Win RT are nearly equal (86/100 vs 83/100).
| Specification | Honor Win RT | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 7870 | |
| AnTuTu | 3095021 | 192269 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 172 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 492 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | 4.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1272x2800 | 1280x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 2350 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 16GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 6.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×76.6×8.3 mm | 135.4×66.2×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 138 g | |
| Price | $384 | $349 |
Honor Win RT
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
- Main: 13MP f/1.9
- Front: 8MP
Honor Win RT
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2800
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
- 4.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x720
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Honor Win RT
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
- 2350 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Win RT and Samsung Galaxy A3 2017, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Win RT leads Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 by 1509.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $35. Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 is cheaper by $35.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (69/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (42/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (80/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 significantly outperforms the Honor Win RT (100/100 vs 13/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 and the Honor Win RT are nearly equal (86/100 vs 83/100).
Which is better: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017?
The Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 by 57 points (66/100 vs 9/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Win RT and the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017?
The Honor Win RT has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 — 9/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017?
The Honor Win RT leads on camera score (42/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017?
The Honor Win RT leads on performance (69/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win RT over the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017?
The Honor Win RT is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.