Honor Win RT vs Lava Blaze Amoled 2
The Honor Win RT (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060; launch prices were $384 and $139. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win RT leads — 75/100 vs 50/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win RT has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 5000); the Honor Win RT is faster in AnTuTu (3,249,469 vs 693,978); the Honor Win RT has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win RT
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
What makes Honor Win RT better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3249469 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (45/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $384
- Better portability (79/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win RT vs the Lava Blaze Amoled 2, the Honor Win RT scores 25 points higher (75/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT leads (92/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Win RT leads (45/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT leads (80/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Honor Win RT — 80/100, Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (92/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (45/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Honor Win RT (79/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win RT | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | |
| AnTuTu | 3249469 | 693978 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1037 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2386 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1272x2800 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×76.6×8.3 mm | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 174 g | |
| Launch price | $384 | $139 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win RT
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Win RT
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2800
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win RT
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win RT and Lava Blaze Amoled 2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Win RT leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 368.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $245. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $245 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (92/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (45/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (80/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Honor Win RT (79/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win RT or the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 25 points (75/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Win RT and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Honor Win RT has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 50/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win RT or the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Honor Win RT leads on camera score (45/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win RT or the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Honor Win RT leads on performance (92/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win RT over the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Honor Win RT is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.