Honor Play9C vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Honor Play9C (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 35/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Play9C has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 513,809); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor Play9C doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play9C
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Honor Play9C better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 201g
- Overall rating 35/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 513809
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 688
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1900
- Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play9C vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 39 points higher (74/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play9C (98/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play9C (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play9C (50/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Honor Play9C are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play9C | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 513809 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 688 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1900 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" TFT LCD | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 780 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×75.3×8.4 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Play9C
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Play9C
- 6.6" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Play9C
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play9C and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Honor Play9C by 87.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play9C (98/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play9C (80/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play9C (50/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Honor Play9C are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play9C or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play9C by 39 points (74/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Play9C and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor Play9C has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Play9C or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Play9C or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play9C over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.