Honor Play6C vs Motorola Moto G (2023)
The Honor Play6C (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Motorola Moto G (2023) (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G (2023) leads — 41/100 vs 33/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 48 MP.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play6C
Motorola Moto G (2023)
What makes Honor Play6C better?
- Overall rating 33/100
What makes Motorola Moto G (2023) better?
- Faster charging: 15W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 194g
- Better camera (29/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (56/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (61/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play6C vs the Motorola Moto G (2023), the Motorola Moto G (2023) scores 8 points higher (41/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G (2023) leads (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G (2023) notably outperforms the Honor Play6C (56/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G (2023) notably outperforms the Honor Play6C (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G (2023) is a bit better (61/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play6C | Motorola Moto G (2023) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 477542 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1816 | |
| Display | 6.5" TFT LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 5W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.1×8.7 mm | 164.0×75.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Play6C
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Moto G (2023)
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Play6C
- 6.5" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Motorola Moto G (2023)
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Play6C
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Moto G (2023)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play6C and Motorola Moto G (2023), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G (2023) notably outperforms the Honor Play6C (56/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G (2023) notably outperforms the Honor Play6C (29/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G (2023) is a bit better (61/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play6C or the Motorola Moto G (2023)?
The Motorola Moto G (2023) edges out the Honor Play6C by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Play6C and the Motorola Moto G (2023)?
The Honor Play6C has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Motorola Moto G (2023) — 41/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Play6C or the Motorola Moto G (2023)?
The Motorola Moto G (2023) leads on camera score (29/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play6C over the Motorola Moto G (2023)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Motorola Moto G (2023) (29/100 vs 10/100).