Honor Play11 Plus vs Poco X7 Pro
The Honor Play11 Plus (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6500 Elite, while the Poco X7 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco X7 Pro leads — 47/100 vs 32/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Play11 Plus has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the Honor Play11 Plus is thinner (7.3mm vs 8.3mm).
Honor Play11 Plus
Poco X7 Pro
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Lighter: 185g vs 195g
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 56/100)
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher performance (29/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 56/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor Play11 Plus vs the Poco X7 Pro, the Poco X7 Pro scores 15 points higher (47/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco X7 Pro leads (29/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco X7 Pro leads (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Play11 Plus (29/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (32/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100). In the "design" category, the Honor Play11 Plus is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Play11 Plus (84/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor Play11 Plus | Poco X7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6500 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1884839 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1579 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 6100 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2600 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 15 / HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 157.4×75.4×7.3 mm | 160.8×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 195 g | |
| Price | — | $369 |
Honor Play11 Plus
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Poco X7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor Play11 Plus
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco X7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Play11 Plus
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Poco X7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Honor Play11 Plus
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Play11 Plus (29/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (32/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor Play11 Plus is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Play11 Plus (84/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor Play11 Plus or the Poco X7 Pro?
The Poco X7 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor Play11 Plus — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Play11 Plus and the Poco X7 Pro?
The Honor Play11 Plus has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Poco X7 Pro — 47/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Play11 Plus or the Poco X7 Pro?
The Poco X7 Pro leads on camera score (32/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Play11 Plus or the Poco X7 Pro?
The Poco X7 Pro leads on performance (29/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play11 Plus over the Poco X7 Pro?
The Honor Play11 Plus is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco X7 Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.