Honor Play 8T vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Honor Play 8T (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 45/100 vs 44/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Play 8T has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo Y77 (China) is faster in AnTuTu (593,307 vs 573,460).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play 8T
Vivo Y77 (China)
What makes Honor Play 8T better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 45/100)
- Better portability (57/100 vs 56/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 593307 vs 573460
- Better Geekbench Single: 915 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2299 vs 2020
- Faster charging: 80W vs 35W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 194g vs 199g
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play 8T vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 1 points higher (45/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Honor Play 8T are nearly equal (47/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (66/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor Play 8T is a bit better (54/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Play 8T and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (57/100 vs 56/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play 8T | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 573460 | 593307 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 915 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 2299 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.7×76.5×8.2 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Play 8T
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Play 8T
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Play 8T
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play 8T and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y77 (China) leads Honor Play 8T by 3.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Honor Play 8T are nearly equal (47/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (66/100 vs 53/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Play 8T is a bit better (54/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Play 8T and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (57/100 vs 56/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play 8T or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) edges out the Honor Play 8T by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Play 8T and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Honor Play 8T has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.
Should you choose the Honor Play 8T over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Vivo Y77 (China) (66/100 vs 53/100).