Honor Play 8T vs Poco X6 Neo
The Honor Play 8T (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Poco X6 Neo (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco X6 Neo leads — 50/100 vs 44/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Play 8T has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Poco X6 Neo is noticeably lighter (175g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play 8T
Poco X6 Neo
What makes Honor Play 8T better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 35W vs 33W
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Poco X6 Neo better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 175g vs 199g
- Better camera (41/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 53/100)
- Better portability (77/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play 8T vs the Poco X6 Neo, the Poco X6 Neo scores 6 points higher (50/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco X6 Neo leads (41/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100. In the "display" category, the Poco X6 Neo notably outperforms the Honor Play 8T (79/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco X6 Neo is a bit better (41/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Play 8T is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco X6 Neo notably outperforms the Honor Play 8T (77/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play 8T | Poco X6 Neo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | |
| AnTuTu | 573460 | 573460 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 750 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 2020 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 166.7×76.5×8.2 mm | 161.1×75.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 175 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Play 8T
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Poco X6 Neo
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor Play 8T
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco X6 Neo
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Play 8T
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Poco X6 Neo
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play 8T and Poco X6 Neo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco X6 Neo notably outperforms the Honor Play 8T (79/100 vs 53/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco X6 Neo is a bit better (41/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Play 8T is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco X6 Neo notably outperforms the Honor Play 8T (77/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play 8T or the Poco X6 Neo?
The Poco X6 Neo edges out the Honor Play 8T by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Play 8T and the Poco X6 Neo?
The Honor Play 8T has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Poco X6 Neo — 50/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Play 8T or the Poco X6 Neo?
The Poco X6 Neo leads on camera score (41/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play 8T over the Poco X6 Neo?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Poco X6 Neo (79/100 vs 53/100).