Honor Play 60 Plus vs Vivo Y6t
The Honor Play 60 Plus (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Vivo Y6t (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Play 60 Plus leads — 30/100 vs 26/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y6t has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP.
Honor Play 60 Plus
Vivo Y6t
- Faster charging: 35W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 197g vs 209g
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (49/100 vs 48/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (53/100 vs 38/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Better value for money (95/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor Play 60 Plus vs the Vivo Y6t, the Honor Play 60 Plus scores 4 points higher (30/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Play 60 Plus leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y6t leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor Play 60 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo Y6t (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Play 60 Plus and the Vivo Y6t are nearly equal (49/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Honor Play 60 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo Y6t (53/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y6t significantly outperforms the Honor Play 60 Plus (95/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor Play 60 Plus | Vivo Y6t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 560863 | 560863 | |
| Geekbench Single | 923 | 923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2249 | 2249 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1610 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 167.0×76.8×8.1 mm | 167.4×77.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 209 g | |
| Price | — | $210 |
Honor Play 60 Plus
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y6t
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Honor Play 60 Plus
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1610
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y6t
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Play 60 Plus
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y6t
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Play 60 Plus and Vivo Y6t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Honor Play 60 Plus
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Play 60 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo Y6t (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Play 60 Plus and the Vivo Y6t are nearly equal (49/100 vs 48/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor Play 60 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo Y6t (53/100 vs 38/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y6t significantly outperforms the Honor Play 60 Plus (95/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor Play 60 Plus or the Vivo Y6t?
The Honor Play 60 Plus edges out the Vivo Y6t by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Play 60 Plus and the Vivo Y6t?
The Honor Play 60 Plus has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y6t — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Play 60 Plus or the Vivo Y6t?
The Honor Play 60 Plus leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play 60 Plus over the Vivo Y6t?
The Honor Play 60 Plus is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y6t is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.