Honor Play 40 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Honor Play 40 Plus (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 40/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Play 40 Plus has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 515,647); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor Play 40 Plus doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.3mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play 40 Plus
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Honor Play 40 Plus better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 196g vs 201g
- Overall rating 40/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 515647
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 690
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1736
- Faster charging: 45W vs 5W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play 40 Plus vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 34 points higher (74/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 Plus (98/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 Plus (80/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Play 40 Plus (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Honor Play 40 Plus are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Play 40 Plus (74/100 vs 59/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play 40 Plus | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 515647 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 690 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1736 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" TFT LCD | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 5W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 167.5×76.9×8.3 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Play 40 Plus
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Play 40 Plus
- 6.7" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Play 40 Plus
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play 40 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Honor Play 40 Plus by 86.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 Plus (98/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 Plus (80/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Play 40 Plus (50/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Honor Play 40 Plus are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Play 40 Plus (74/100 vs 59/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play 40 Plus or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 Plus by 34 points (74/100 vs 40/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Play 40 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor Play 40 Plus has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Play 40 Plus or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Play 40 Plus or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play 40 Plus over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.