Honor Play 30M 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A71
The Honor Play 30M 5G (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus (), while the Samsung Galaxy A71 (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 730. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A71 leads — 22/100 vs 10/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Play 30M 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 13 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A71 has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor Play 30M 5G doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A71 is noticeably lighter (179g vs 194g).
Honor Play 30M 5G
Samsung Galaxy A71
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 24/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 179g vs 194g
- Better camera (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 57/100)
- Better value for money (77/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor Play 30M 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy A71, the Samsung Galaxy A71 scores 12 points higher (22/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Play 30M 5G leads (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 leads (77/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 significantly outperforms the Honor Play 30M 5G (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Play 30M 5G is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 notably outperforms the Honor Play 30M 5G (76/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 notably outperforms the Honor Play 30M 5G (77/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor Play 30M 5G | Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus () | Snapdragon 730 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 496392 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 724 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1836 | |
| Display | 6.5" TFT LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | — | |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 75.1×163.7×8.7 mm | 163.6×76.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | $470 |
Honor Play 30M 5G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy A71
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Play 30M 5G
- 6.5" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A71
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Honor Play 30M 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A71
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Honor Play 30M 5G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 significantly outperforms the Honor Play 30M 5G (43/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Play 30M 5G is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 notably outperforms the Honor Play 30M 5G (76/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 notably outperforms the Honor Play 30M 5G (77/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor Play 30M 5G or the Samsung Galaxy A71?
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is noticeably better than the Honor Play 30M 5G — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Play 30M 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A71?
The Honor Play 30M 5G has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the Samsung Galaxy A71 — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Play 30M 5G or the Samsung Galaxy A71?
The Samsung Galaxy A71 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play 30M 5G over the Samsung Galaxy A71?
The Honor Play 30M 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.