Honor Magic9 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Honor Magic9 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 leads — 92/100 vs 58/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Honor Magic9 is faster in AnTuTu (4,288,382 vs 1,010,069).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9
ZTE Axon 40 pro
What makes Honor Magic9 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4288382 vs 1010069
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1298
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3520
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 65W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 61/100)
- Better camera (100/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 209g
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the Honor Magic9 scores 34 points higher (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 leads (99/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 leads (100/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 leads (86/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (99/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Honor Magic9 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (100/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (86/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Honor Magic9 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 4288382 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.4" OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1236x2664 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 55 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.0×72.3×8.5 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 55MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9
- 6.4" OLED
- Resolution: 1236x2664
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 leads ZTE Axon 40 pro by 324.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (99/100 vs 61/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Honor Magic9 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (100/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (86/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Honor Magic9 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro by 34 points (92/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Honor Magic9 has a MobileRank rating of 92/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Honor Magic9 leads on camera score (100/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Honor Magic9 leads on performance (99/100 vs 61/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Honor Magic9 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.