Honor Magic9 vs Samsung Galaxy A33
The Honor Magic9 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy A33 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 leads — 92/100 vs 46/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 48 MP; the Honor Magic9 is faster in AnTuTu (4,288,382 vs 615,425); the Samsung Galaxy A33 is noticeably lighter (186g vs 209g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9
Samsung Galaxy A33
What makes Honor Magic9 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4288382 vs 615425
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 956
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2082
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (100/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 69/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A33 better?
- Lighter: 186g vs 209g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 vs the Samsung Galaxy A33, the Honor Magic9 scores 46 points higher (92/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 leads (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 leads (100/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 leads (86/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (85/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (100/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (86/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A33 notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 (66/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 | Samsung Galaxy A33 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 1280 | |
| AnTuTu | 4288382 | 615425 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 956 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 2082 | |
| Display | 6.4" OLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1236x2664 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 85 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 55 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP67 | |
| Dimensions | 151.0×72.3×8.5 mm | 159.7×74.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 186 g | |
| Launch price | — | $370 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 55MP
Samsung Galaxy A33
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9
- 6.4" OLED
- Resolution: 1236x2664
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A33
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy A33
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 and Samsung Galaxy A33, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 leads Samsung Galaxy A33 by 596.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic9
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (99/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (85/100 vs 69/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (100/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (86/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A33 notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 (66/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 or the Samsung Galaxy A33?
The Honor Magic9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 by 46 points (92/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 and the Samsung Galaxy A33?
The Honor Magic9 has a MobileRank rating of 92/100, the Samsung Galaxy A33 — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 or the Samsung Galaxy A33?
The Honor Magic9 leads on camera score (100/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 or the Samsung Galaxy A33?
The Honor Magic9 leads on performance (99/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 over the Samsung Galaxy A33?
The Honor Magic9 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.