Honor Magic9 Super vs ZTE Blade A76 4G

A full comparison of the Honor Magic9 Super and the ZTE Blade A76 4G is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Blade A76 4G to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic9 Super

Performance 99
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 91
Portability 41
Value for money —

ZTE Blade A76 4G

Performance —
Display 43
Camera 31
Battery 43
Portability —
Value for money —

What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?

  • Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 5W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

What makes ZTE Blade A76 4G better?

Comparison verdict

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic9 Super ZTE Blade A76 4G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 —
AnTuTu 4290399 —
Geekbench Single 3639 —
Geekbench Multi 11047 —
Display 6.8" OLED 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 1280x2788 720x1612
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 11000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W 5W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP —
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 17 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 10000 nits —
NFC yes no
Protection IP68/IP69K IP54
Dimensions 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm —
Weight 227 g —
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Honor Magic9 Super

  • Main: 200MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
78
camera

ZTE Blade A76 4G

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: —
31
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic9 Super

  • 6.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2788
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

ZTE Blade A76 4G

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic9 Super

  • 11000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
91
battery

ZTE Blade A76 4G

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 5W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Benchmarks