Honor Magic9 Super vs ZTE Blade A53
VS
A full comparison of the Honor Magic9 Super and the ZTE Blade A53 is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Blade A53 to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Performance
99
Display
84
Camera
78
Battery
91
Portability
41
Value for money
—
ZTE Blade A53
Performance
—
Display
—
Camera
10
Battery
25
Portability
22
Value for money
—
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
What makes ZTE Blade A53 better?
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | ZTE Blade A53 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Spreadtrum Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | — | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 165.7×76.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
78
cameraZTE Blade A53
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
10
cameraDisplay comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
displayZTE Blade A53
- Refresh rate: —
—
displayBattery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
91
batteryZTE Blade A53
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
25
battery