Honor Magic9 Super vs ZTE Blade A53 Pro
VS
A full comparison of the Honor Magic9 Super and the ZTE Blade A53 Pro is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the ZTE Blade A53 Pro to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Performance
99
Display
84
Camera
78
Battery
91
Portability
41
Value for money
—
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
Performance
—
Display
—
Camera
10
Battery
66
Portability
40
Value for money
—
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
What makes ZTE Blade A53 Pro better?
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | ZTE Blade A53 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Spreadtrum Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | — | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 164.8×75.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
78
cameraZTE Blade A53 Pro
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
10
cameraDisplay comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
displayZTE Blade A53 Pro
- Refresh rate: —
—
displayBattery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
91
batteryZTE Blade A53 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
66
battery