Honor Magic9 Super vs ZTE Blade A35
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 36/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 8 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A35 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
ZTE Blade A35
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 43/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A35 better?
- Better portability (46/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the ZTE Blade A35, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 51 points higher (87/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (84/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A35 is a bit better (46/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (84/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (78/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (91/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A35 is a bit better (46/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 by 51 points (87/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.