Honor Magic9 Super vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 64/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 879,714).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1001
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2918
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 53/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 23 points higher (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (78/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (78/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1001 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 2918 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 138 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 15, HIOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G by 387.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (78/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (91/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (78/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G by 23 points (87/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.