Honor Magic9 Super vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 52/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 575,630); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is noticeably lighter (178g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 575630
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2014
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G better?
- Lighter: 178g vs 227g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 35 points higher (87/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (79/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 575630 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 2014 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 15, HIOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 164.4×74.3×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 178 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G by 645.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G (99/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G (78/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G (91/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (79/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G by 35 points (87/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G — 52/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.