Honor Magic9 Super vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 54/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 12 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 1,420,808); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 5W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 26/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 227g
- Better display (91/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 33 points higher (87/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (78/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (91/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (80/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 1420808 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 4688 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 1080x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 3800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 30W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 12 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 184 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 202.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (99/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (78/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (91/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (80/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 33 points (87/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users.