Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design vs Pocophone F1
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Pocophone F1 (2018) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845; launch prices were $1090 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads — 88/100 vs 33/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 12 MP; the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 572,788); the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design has NFC for contactless payments, the Pocophone F1 doesn't; the Pocophone F1 is noticeably lighter (182g vs 239g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design
Pocophone F1
What makes Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 572788
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 566
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2130
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 14/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 27/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Pocophone F1 better?
- Lighter: 182g vs 239g
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $1090
- Better portability (61/100 vs 30/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design vs the Pocophone F1, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design scores 55 points higher (88/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads (98/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads (87/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads (92/100 vs 27/100). Value score: Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design — 86/100, Pocophone F1 — 4/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Pocophone F1 (98/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Pocophone F1 (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Pocophone F1 (87/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Pocophone F1 (92/100 vs 27/100). In the "portability" category, the Pocophone F1 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design (61/100 vs 30/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design | Pocophone F1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | |
| AnTuTu | 3950082 | 572788 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 566 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 2130 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO OLED | 6.2" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1256x2808 | 2246x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB / 24GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB / 1TB | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 8.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.0×8.5 mm | 155.5×75.3×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | 239 g | 182 g | |
| Launch price | $1090 | $300 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Pocophone F1
- Main: 12MP f/1.9
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design
- 6.7" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1256x2808
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Pocophone F1
- 6.2" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2246x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 80W
Pocophone F1
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design and Pocophone F1, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads Pocophone F1 by 589.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $790. Pocophone F1 was $790 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Pocophone F1 (98/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Pocophone F1 (85/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Pocophone F1 (87/100 vs 14/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Pocophone F1 (92/100 vs 27/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Pocophone F1 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design (61/100 vs 30/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design or the Pocophone F1?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Pocophone F1 by 55 points (88/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design and the Pocophone F1?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Pocophone F1 — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design or the Pocophone F1?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads on camera score (87/100 vs 14/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design or the Pocophone F1?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads on performance (98/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design over the Pocophone F1?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.