Honor Magic7 vs Vivo X200 Ultra

The Honor Magic7 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $550 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 78/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5650); the Honor Magic7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 3,092,340); the Honor Magic7 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 229g).

The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Honor Magic7 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7
Performance 92
Display 84
Camera 56
Battery 81
Portability 60
Value for money 76
Vivo X200 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 78
Portability 34
Value for money 84
What makes Honor Magic7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 3092340
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 199g vs 229g
  • Cheaper at launch: $550 vs $889

  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (60/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9494
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5650 mAh

  • Better camera (93/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic7 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 8 points higher (86/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 — 76/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 (93/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).

Honor Magic7: The Honor Magic7 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Magic7 Vivo X200 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3119308 3092340
Geekbench Single 3041 3100
Geekbench Multi 9494 10095
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1256 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5650 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 100W 90W
Wireless charging 80W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 167
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 15 / OriginOS 5
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.1×75.8×8.0 mm 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 199 g 229 g
Launch price $550 $889
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
56
camera
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
93
camera
Display comparison
Honor Magic7
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1256
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7
  • 5650 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
81
battery
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
78
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic7 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3119308 AnTuTu
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 -0.9%
3092340 AnTuTu

Honor Magic7 leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 0.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic7
$550
Vivo X200 Ultra
$889

Launch price difference: $339. Honor Magic7 was $339 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 (93/100 vs 56/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Honor Magic7 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Honor Magic7 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 56/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic7 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Honor Magic7 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.