Honor Magic7 Pro vs OPPO Reno15 Pro Max

The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8450; launch prices were $1099 and $560. Both devices score the same overall rating of 82/100. Key differences: the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5270); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,433 vs 2,131,620); the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max is noticeably lighter (205g vs 223g).

Both devices scored the same rating of 82/100 — the choice comes down to your priorities.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic7 Pro

Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 74

OPPO Reno15 Pro Max

Performance 77
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 81
Portability 59
Value for money 82

What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014433 vs 2131620
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1612
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 6210
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 50W

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 77/100)

What makes OPPO Reno15 Pro Max better?

  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5270 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 205g vs 223g
  • Cheaper at launch: $560 vs $1099

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 36/100)

Comparison verdict

The Honor Magic7 Pro and the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max received the same MobileRank rating — 82/100. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (91/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max leads (94/100 vs 79/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 74/100, OPPO Reno15 Pro Max — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (59/100 vs 36/100).

Honor Magic7 Pro: The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
OPPO Reno15 Pro Max: The OPPO Reno15 Pro Max is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic7 Pro OPPO Reno15 Pro Max
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 8450
AnTuTu 3014433 2131620
Geekbench Single 3057 1612
Geekbench Multi 9302 6210
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1280 1272x2772
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5270 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 100W 80W
Wireless charging 80W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 148 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 1800 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP68
Dimensions 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm 161.3×76.5×7.7 mm
Weight 223 g 205 g
Launch price $1099 $560

Camera comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera

OPPO Reno15 Pro Max

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

OPPO Reno15 Pro Max

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1272x2772
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery

OPPO Reno15 Pro Max

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and OPPO Reno15 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
3014433 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno15 Pro Max MediaTek Dimensity 8450
82/100 -41.4%
2131620 AnTuTu

Honor Magic7 Pro leads OPPO Reno15 Pro Max by 41.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Magic7 Pro

$1099

OPPO Reno15 Pro Max

$560

Launch price difference: $539. OPPO Reno15 Pro Max was $539 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (94/100 vs 79/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (59/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max?

Both devices scored 82/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Honor Magic7 Pro (91/100 vs 77/100).

What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max?

The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max?

The OPPO Reno15 Pro Max leads on camera score (94/100 vs 79/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max?

The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the OPPO Reno15 Pro Max?

The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The OPPO Reno15 Pro Max is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.